NATO and the West won't contribute to help Trump with the IRGC. They know he will do it anyway.

6/6/2026
2 min read
By Bruce R. Long

Recently Donald Trump stated that Iran has about 20-21% of their missile arsenal left.

The first thing to notice: Trump's taking notice and paying attention. There's nothing flaky about his evident interest in the situation.

Secondly: 80% smashed is pretty smashed. My guess (based upon public information) is Trump and his administration are facing some internal resistance ( e.g. Gabbard's resignation) but mostly: they're upset about NATO and the West failing to support them militarily and strategically. The kind of America First protectionist politics that Trump does is naturally going to involve he and Rubio throwing their hands up and saying "Okay. So be it. If you don't want to contribute, we don't have to do it ourselves. Let's see you deal with the IRGC once they start to re-arm and get bolder."

The challenge for Trump is psychological, political, and linked to economics. The rest of the West and NATO know that the America First protectionist line was the conceptual, ideological, and operational motive for Trump's action on Iran, and that's likely making them sit on their hands, check their watches, and politically snipe.

Ethically speaking they probably should be assisting, but there are other hard-nosed political and economic realities to face. For example: why spend resources when they know that Trump (rightly) links suppression of the IRGC with US national security? Their cynical and psychologically sound bet may well be that he will be forced to act anyway, and already feels compelled to do so.

This is largely a self-fulfilling situational prophecy at this point. I would surmise that--given their extreme group psychopathology--the chances of Iran's Islamic hate cult not escalating acts of outright aggression in a crescendo of bloodthirsty insanity that makes their February slaughter of protestors and liberal women look mild is diminishingly close to zero. When they do it (if Trump waits long enough to give them the chance), the US domestic political opposition to further military action will have eroded to ineffectuality.

I moreover still think that strategically and tactically, Iran's posturing and stubbornness has been a mistake. It's very likely that US Central Command is using the time to produce a mass surgical drone capability on multiple levels of capability from LUCAS to new anti-personnel drone swarms. Once those are tested to satisfaction, CENTCOM's hawks will be keen to field test them. Trump will oblige, and recently planned interdictions by the US in Iran have a terrifying success rate. To make matters worse for Iran, the kind of AI that the US is busy evolving right now is not only world-leading, but simply unaffordable for a nation like Iran to match in any meaningful sense. US LLM technology promises to sustain the nation's super-power status even in the face of a monumental foreign debt.

Cartoon comic frame of Donald Trump twiddling his thumps waiting to attack Iran while IRGC generals sake their first at him in rage and while NATO generals and European leaders stand by checking their watches and tapping their feet. One of the European leaders is saying to the others "Any time now..."

Continue Reading

Articles
The Chemical Memory of the Second Layer

The Chemical Memory of the Second Layer

Why a single-layer matrix is trapped in the present, and how two attention heads build an emergent circuit. The Fading Horizon of Sequential Reading Before the Transformer architecture, recurrent neural networks read…

The Empty Cup: Why Pretend Play Requires a Self

The Empty Cup: Why Pretend Play Requires a Self

A child cannot pretend to drink from an empty cup until they pass the mirror test. That developmental rule exposes the flaw in AI roleplay. When an engineer prompts a large language model to "act as a senior clinical…

The Purkinje Shift: Why AI Night Scenes Trigger the Uncanny Valley

The Purkinje Shift: Why AI Night Scenes Trigger the Uncanny Valley

True darkness isn't an absence of light. It is a biological shift in spectral sensitivity that generic generative models cannot emulate. The Mathematics of Fake Darkness When a generic text-to-image model is prompted to…

The Gravity of Character

The Gravity of Character

Personality doesn't just react to the world; it actively creates it through selection, evocation, and manipulation. Brands can do the same. The Passive Fallacy We tend to think of personality, or brand identity, as a…

The Evaluator's Bind

The Evaluator's Bind

Why you can't trust an intelligent system that knows you're testing it. Good behaviour under evaluation is weak evidence of good character. The Interview Persona You have met this person. They are flawless in the job…

Cosmic filters, the Drake equation, genetic informational complexity, and the Fermi Paradox: Why the US government's disclosure is likely a hoax and we're probably alone.

Cosmic filters, the Drake equation, genetic informational complexity, and the Fermi Paradox: Why the US government's disclosure is likely a hoax and we're probably alone.

Why the US government and military are probably doing a UFO psyop, and we're probably alone... I decided to put Gemini Pro onto the challenge of the Fermi paradox when I was appraising this recent piece of research…


Discussion

(0)

Join the discussion

Sign in to comment