Therapists are not AI proof. Why? Because the nature of an AI therapist changes everything, including the essential dynamics of rapport building.

4/7/2026
3 min read
By Bruce R. Long




(Original Article: https://brucerlong.blogspot.com/2025/05/therapists-are-not-ai-proof-why-because.html)

Does an AI therapist or counsellor need the same set of soft skills and rapport building capabilities/practices as a human therapist?

It's very unlikely.

In fact: no. It doesn't.

But it can deploy near flawless soft skills anyway.

The rapport building is not necessary because human trust is not needed in such a situation. The GPR is just reliable and non-judgmental.

Therapists need rapport building because the client knows they're dealing with a human with human emotional and moral habits and attitudes, and with all of the properties which make negotiating asymmetric interpersonal relationships difficult. Judgementalism. Moral umbrage. Superior intellect. Condescension. Intrinsic bias. Patronising views. Politics. Gender bias. The list goes on.

Human clients - including young people - know that most such dynamics and issues do not matter with an AI GPR, but that the AI GPR can still provide enormous epistemic-therapeutic resources and emotional support, including emulating empathy if necessary.

The client doesn't have to worry about what the therapist really thinks about them, but can still rely upon it having better knowledge, skills, and engagement than most error-prone and flawed therapists.

Forbes overestimates how AI proof teaching roles and therapy roles are...




Philosophy and perhaps performance art might be an exception because of the abstract and complex nature of many of the concepts involved. But all other teaching roles which involve teaching mostly quantitative and procedural skills (law, finance, most sciences) are vulnerable to replacement with an AI GPR.

I also think that the therapy role optimism is misplaced. There are several reasons for this:

1. Iatrogenic injury

Iatrogenic injury is caused not only by physicians by but psychiatrists and psychologists, and the rate of II is very high. AI and AI GPRs are far less likely to make the kinds of errors that lead to iatrogenic injury. That reason alone is enough.

2. Therapist Quality

A lot of human therapists might not cause iatrogenic injury, but are just not very good, and figuring this out can take a long time and cost money and time. Quality control is much easier with AI agents and AI agentive GPRs.

3. Therapist Fit is Solved

It is not easy to find a human therapist who is the right fit. This IS something that can be solved by AI which a) has massive resources for assessing what the client needs and b) can use almost perfect knowledge of all salient theories and methodologies in care delivery to adjust its approach and response, constantly and near-flawlessly measuring behavioural and emotional feedback from the client.

The AI therapist can change to fit the client's needs easily and dynamically.

4. Rapport building is NOT NEEDED

Rapport building and human trust is unnecessary for a human client of an AI GPR because human clients - including children - know that they don't need to worry about the social and interpersonal safety and comfort of the therapist. Assuming otherwise is a mistake. The human client knows that they will get all of the answers and guidance required on the basis of far more complete knowledge than a human therapist can offer without any need to worry about human awkwardness, judgement, moral disgust, or any kind of ick factor.

The AI GPR therapist doesn't have to convince the client that it's their friend and likes them, because the client doesn't need to care about it when they're not being assessed by a human. This doesn't necessarily negatively affect the quality of therapy, and to think otherwise is almost certainly a mistake.

The need for human rapport is just an interpersonal roadblock or bottleneck that is removed with an AI therapist. Nonetheless, a good AI GPR will have the ability to induce calm by way of very good tone, emotional responses, and gently spoken assurance. The massive available expertise levels alone are comforting. The client will be aware that the AI GPR has vastly more resources to draw upon and can do so quickly and accurately. Integration with facial recognition systems that read facial cues by using face image deep learning systems and similar systems for body language already exist.






Continue Reading

Articles
The Chemical Memory of the Second Layer

The Chemical Memory of the Second Layer

Why a single-layer matrix is trapped in the present, and how two attention heads build an emergent circuit. The Fading Horizon of Sequential Reading Before the Transformer architecture, recurrent neural networks read…

The Empty Cup: Why Pretend Play Requires a Self

The Empty Cup: Why Pretend Play Requires a Self

A child cannot pretend to drink from an empty cup until they pass the mirror test. That developmental rule exposes the flaw in AI roleplay. When an engineer prompts a large language model to "act as a senior clinical…

The Purkinje Shift: Why AI Night Scenes Trigger the Uncanny Valley

The Purkinje Shift: Why AI Night Scenes Trigger the Uncanny Valley

True darkness isn't an absence of light. It is a biological shift in spectral sensitivity that generic generative models cannot emulate. The Mathematics of Fake Darkness When a generic text-to-image model is prompted to…

The Gravity of Character

The Gravity of Character

Personality doesn't just react to the world; it actively creates it through selection, evocation, and manipulation. Brands can do the same. The Passive Fallacy We tend to think of personality, or brand identity, as a…

The Evaluator's Bind

The Evaluator's Bind

Why you can't trust an intelligent system that knows you're testing it. Good behaviour under evaluation is weak evidence of good character. The Interview Persona You have met this person. They are flawless in the job…

Cosmic filters, the Drake equation, genetic informational complexity, and the Fermi Paradox: Why the US government's disclosure is likely a hoax and we're probably alone.

Cosmic filters, the Drake equation, genetic informational complexity, and the Fermi Paradox: Why the US government's disclosure is likely a hoax and we're probably alone.

Why the US government and military are probably doing a UFO psyop, and we're probably alone... I decided to put Gemini Pro onto the challenge of the Fermi paradox when I was appraising this recent piece of research…


Discussion

(0)

Join the discussion

Sign in to comment